Cases 11 - 20 of 21
Barclay v. Geico Choice Insurance Company
as 1:2021cv00120
Plaintiff:
Jacob Barclay
Defendant:
Geico Choice Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1391
Johnson-Moffet v. GEICO Choice Insurance Company
as 6:2020cv01285
Plaintiff:
William Johnson-Moffet
Defendant:
GEICO Choice Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Tofiga, Jr. et al v. Gieco Choice Insurance Company
as 3:2020cv00199
Plaintiff:
Timoteo Tofiga, Jr. and Joyce Fetu
Defendant:
Gieco Choice Insurance Company, Policy No: 4566 and Geico Choice Insurance Company, Policy No: 4566
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Yang v. GEICO Choice Insurance Company
as 3:2020cv00144
Plaintiff:
Thong Yang
Defendant:
GEICO Choice Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Lester v. GEICO Choice Insurance Company
as 5:2020cv00395
Plaintiff:
Jackie Lee Lester
Defendant:
GEICO Choice Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Bartlett v. Walton
as 4:2020cv00012
Plaintiff:
Christopher Bartlett
Interested Party:
Geico Choice Insurance Company
Defendant:
Tia Latrice Walton
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Puetz et al v. Geico Choice Insurance Company
as 6:2019cv00073
Plaintiff:
Josie Ray Puetz, Marco Antonio Ferova and Augustina Ferova
Defendant:
Geico Choice Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Frazier v. Geico Choice Insurance Company
as 3:2019cv05059
Plaintiff:
Marti B Frazier
Defendant:
Geico Choice Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Fendryk, Randy et al v. Hays, Catalina et al
as 3:2019cv00646
Plaintiff:
Randy A. Fendryk and United Services Automobile Association
Defendant:
Catalina Ivanovna Hays and Geico Choice Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
HASSOON v. GEICO CHOICE INSURANCE COMPANY
as 5:2019cv02561
Plaintiff:
FARIS HASSON and FARIS HASSOON
Defendant:
GEICO CHOICE INSURANCE COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1391
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
