Cases 31 - 40 of 126
Harper v. Harper et al
as 3:2018cv00510
Defendant:
Stephen R. Bloomquest, Esq., Joy C. Gentry, Lacey Simpson McKinnon and others
Plaintiff:
Guy Roderick Harper
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
McRavion v. Cline et al
as 5:2018cv00053
Plaintiff:
Joshua Glenn McRavion
Defendant:
Tiffany Gentry Cline, Dennis Harris and Micah J. Sanderson
Cause Of Action: Prisoner Civil Rights
Sluss v. Gentry et al
as 2:2018cv00077
Plaintiff:
Matthew Sluss
Defendant:
Raymond Gentry and Burnie Borden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Stacker et al v. Wilder et al
as 7:2017cv02464
Plaintiff:
Stephen Stacker and Kandy Stacker
Defendant:
Janice Wilder, JW Foods Inc, James A Gentry and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Eric DePaola v. Harold Clarke
as 17-7067
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ERIC JOSEPH DEPAOLA
Defendant - Appellee:
HAROLD CLARKE, A. DAVID ROBINSON, EARL BARKSDALE and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2017cv03656
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1211
Gentry v. Boston Scientific Corporation
as 2:2017cv03629
Plaintiff:
Tina Gentry
Defendant:
Boston Scientific Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Gentry v. Virginia Department of Corrections et al
as 1:2017cv00766
Plaintiff:
Devion Gentry
Defendant:
Virginia Department of Corrections, Nottoway Correctional Center, A. David Robinson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
McRavion v. Cline et al
as 5:2017cv00082
Plaintiff:
Joshua Glenn McRavion
Defendant:
Tiffany Gentry Cline, Dennis Harris and Micha J. Sanderson
Cause Of Action: Prisoner Civil Rights
John Gentry v. Hyundai Motor America, Incorpo
as 17-1611
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JOHN WILLIAM GENTRY, individually and on behalf of all other Virginia owners similarly situated, LINDA RUTH SCOTT, individually and on behalf of all other Virginia owners similarly situated, DANIELLE KAY GILLELAND and others
Defendant - Appellee:
HYUNDAI MOTOR AMERICA, INCORPORATED
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
