Cases
Cases 11 - 20 of 40
BANKS v. KRUEGER We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2017cv00294
Petitioner: GEORGE BANKS
Respondent: J. E. KRUEGER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
USA v. George Bank
as 16-2959
Plaintiff - Appellee: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant: GEORGE BANKS
George Banks v. Ricardo Rios, et al
as 15-1787
Plaintiff - Appellant: GEORGE BANKS
Defendant - Appellee: RICARDO RIOS, Warden, GREGORY TERRY, Medical A.D.M. Pekin, IL and SCOTT MOATS, Head Doctor
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2014cv05900
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Banks v. Rios et al
as 1:2013cv01454
Plaintiff: George Banks
Defendant: Ricardo Rios, Geogory Terry and Dr Moats
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Banks v. USA We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2013cv00093
Petitioner: George Banks
Respondent: USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Banks v. USA We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2012cv00213
Petitioner: George Banks
Respondent: USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
BANKS v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 2:2012cv06610
Plaintiff: GEORGE BANKS
Defendant: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Banks v. DePuy Orthopaedics, Inc. et al
as 3:2012cv01248
Plaintiff: George Banks
Defendant: DePuy Orthopaedics, Inc. , DePuy Inc , DePuy International Limited and others
Pecial_master: Special Master
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Banks v. DePuy Orthopaedics, Inc. et al
as TXN/3:12-cv-01248
Plaintiff: George Banks
Defendant: DePuy Orthopaedics, Inc. , DePuy Inc , DePuy International Limited and others
Pecial_master: Special Master

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?