Cases 11 - 20 of 159
CASE OPENED IN ERROR
as 4:2022cv00406
Defendant:
Standard Fire Insurance Company and Gill Winifred
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Account Receivable
Winifred v. Standard Fire Insurance Company
as 4:2022cv00407
Plaintiff:
Gill Winifred
Defendant:
Standard Fire Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Account Receivable
Martin Leigh PC v. Gregory Leyh, et al
as 22-1975
Plaintiff:
Gwen G. Caranchini, also known as Gwendolyn Gill Caranchini
Defendant:
Nationstar Mortgage, LLC
Defendant / Appellee:
Martin Leigh, P.C.
Interested Party:
Gregory Leyh and Gregory Leyh, P.C.
Carlton-Lee v. Elkins
as 2:2022cv02038
Plaintiff:
Ellen Madison Carlton-Lee and Ellen Madison Gill
Defendant:
Dr. Elkins
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Gill v. Henry et al
as 6:2022cv06021
Plaintiff:
Johnse Desmon Gill
Defendant:
Dr Guy Henry, Nurse Ables, US Magistrate Judge Barry Bryant and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Gill v. Henry et al
as 6:2022cv06013
Plaintiff:
Johnse Desmon Gill
Defendant:
Dr Guy Henry, U.S. Judge Susan O. Hickey, U.S.Magistrate Judge Barry Bryant and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
USA v. Gill
as 4:2021cv01235
Plaintiff:
USA
Defendant:
Lillie C Gill
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345 Debt to United States
Blue State Refugees et al v. Noem et al
as 3:2021cv03024
Plaintiff:
Blue State Refugees, Luke Robertson and Chad Dollick
Defendant:
Kristi Noem, Scott Bollinger, Brent Gill and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Brothern v. Telegraph Herald et al
as 2:2021cv01024
Plaintiff:
Anthony George Brothern
Defendant:
Telegraph Herald, Woodward Communications, Inc, Dustin Kass and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Gill v Social Security Administration Commissioner
as 2:2021cv02129
Plaintiff:
Jeffrey H. Gill
Defendant:
Social Security Administration Commissioner
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
