Cases 21 - 30 of 7,980
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv04725
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Estate of Lane Caviness, et al v. Atlas Air, Inc., et al
as 24-11033
Plaintiff:
ESTATE OF LANE CAVINESS, PATRICK AKERLUND, MICHAEL ALZATI and others
Defendant:
ATLAS AIR, INC. and FLIGHT SERVICES INTERNATIONAL, LLC
Not Yet Classified:
SERVICE
Beaudry v. Hansen et al
as 0:2024cv01126
Plaintiff:
Trevor John Beaudry
Defendant:
Caleb Glen Hansen and Becker, City of, the
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Paul Grundy, et al v. FCA US, LLC
as 24-1267
Plaintiff:
PAUL GRUNDY, CARL WOOD, CHRISTOPHER LANGLEY and others
Defendant:
FCA US, LLC
Waller v. City of Nogales, et al.
as 24-1864
Plaintiff:
CORA J. WALLER, on her own behalf and as a personal representative of the estate of Glen Ray Cockrum, Jr.
Defendant:
CITY OF NOGALES, ROY BERMUDEZ, COUNTY OF SANTA CRUZ and others
Glen Sedlacek v. Eric Rardin
as 24-1254
Petitioner:
GLEN ARLAN SEDLACEK
Respondent:
ERIC RARDIN, Warden
Howell v. State of Mississippi et al
as 1:2024cv00057
Plaintiff:
April Mae Howell
Defendant:
State of Mississippi, Delbert Hosemann, Secretary of State Michael Watson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Bayside Community Ambulance Corps., Inc. v. Glen Oaks Volunteer Ambulance Corps., Inc. et al
as 1:2024cv02114
Plaintiff:
Bayside Community Ambulance Corps., Inc. and Bayside Volunteer Ambulance Corps.
Defendant:
Glen Oaks Volunteer Ambulance Corps., Inc. and Does 1 through 10
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125 Trademark Infringement (Lanham Act)
Carpentino v. Richards et al
as 3:2024cv00411
Plaintiff:
Linda Carpentino
Defendant:
Glen Richards and National Railroad Passenger Corporation doing business as Amtrak
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Personal Injury
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
