Cases 1 - 10 of 50
Glynndeavin Von Fox v. Sergeant Raymond Odell et al
as 2:2024cv03590
Plaintiff:
Glynndeavin Von Fox
Defendant:
Sergeant Raymond Odell and Police Officer Neil Sneath
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Von Fox v. Duncan
as 6:2024cv01072
Plaintiff:
Glynndeavin Von Fox
Defendant:
Kelly Duncan
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Von Fox v. Nicholson
as 8:2023cv00544
Plaintiff:
Glynn Dravin Von Fox and Glynndeavin Von Fox
Defendant:
Judge J. C. Nicholson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Von Fox v. Gergel et al
as 2:2023cv06273
Plaintiff:
Von Fox Glynndeavin and Glynndeavin Von Fox
Defendant:
Judge Richard Gergel and Judge Mary Gordon Baker
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Glynndeavin Von Fox v. The United States of America et al
as 2:2022cv04314
Plaintiff:
Glynndeavin Von Fox
Defendant:
The United States of America, Barack Obama, United States Embassy London and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Von Fox v. Charleston Police Department et al
as 1:2017cv11834
Plaintiff:
Glynndeavin Von Fox
Defendant:
Charleston Police Department, State of New York and State of South Carolina
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Glynndeavin von Fox v. College of Charleston
as 17-1864
Plaintiff - Appellant:
GLYNNDEAVIN VON FOX
Defendant - Appellee:
COLLEGE OF CHARLESTON
von Fox v. College of Charleston
as 2:2017cv00483
Plaintiff:
Glynndeavin von Fox
Defendant:
College of Charleston
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Glynndeavin von Fox v. Seaton Law Firm
as 16-1344
Plaintiff - Appellant:
GLYNNDEAVIN VON FOX
Defendant - Appellee:
GROVER BEAU SEATON, Esq., B. J. BILTON, Paralegal, RACHEL MCKEIN, Esq. and others
Glynndeavin von Fox v. State of South Carolina
as 16-1337
Plaintiff - Appellant:
GLYNNDEAVIN VON FOX
Defendant - Appellee:
THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA and CHARLESTON COUNTY CLERK OF COURT
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
