Cases 1 - 10 of 734
Gomes Calixto v. Garland
as 24-1151
Petitioner:
NACIPE GOMES CALIXTO, JULIANA DA SILVA GUEDES and MARIA ALICE GUEDES CALIXTO
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, UNITED STATES ATTORNEY GENERAL
US v. Gomes Da Silva
as 24-1308
Defendant / Appellee:
UNITED STATES
Defendant:
WALTER GOMES DA SILVA
Ferreira v. Mayorkas et al
as 4:2024cv01820
Plaintiff:
Daniel Gomes Ferreira
Defendant:
Secretary Alejandro Mayorkas, Ur Mendoza Jaddou and Connie Nolan
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00859
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00106
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
Mark Gemmell v. The Partnerships and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule A
as 1:2024cv00580
Plaintiff:
Mark Gemmell
Defendant:
The Partnerships and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule A, QIUING, baobeibaoxiaopu and others
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101 Copyright Infringement
Wilson v. Watson et al
as 2:2024cv00159
Plaintiff:
Lindsey Antonio Wilson
Defendant:
D. Watson, K. Knolls, Ms. Gomes and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Rosa, et al v. Garland
as 24-1240
Petitioner:
LECY FREDERICO ROSA, MARIA EDUARDA FREDERICO-DE SOUZA and MARISTELA GOMES-DE SOUZA FREDERICO
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND
Ricardo Fernandes-Gomes, et al v. Attorney General United States of America
as 24-1392
Petitioner:
RICARDO FERNANDES-GOMES, JESSICA CARDOSO PEREIRA-FERNANDES and H. A. C-F.
Respondent:
ATTORNEY GENERAL UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv10109
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
