Cases 1 - 10 of 11
Rapkin v. Village of Shorewood et al
as 2:2023cv00670
Plaintiff:
Stephanie Rapkin
Defendant:
Village of Shorewood, Village of Whitefish Bay, Peter A Nimmer and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2018cv04411
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Govani v. Carnival Corporation
as 1:2018cv21107
Plaintiff:
Barak Govani
Defendant:
Carnival Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2016cv00178
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1447
J&J Sports Productions Inc v. Homestyle Restaurant Group LLC et al
as 2:2015cv00476
Plaintiff:
J&J Sports Productions Inc
Defendant:
Homestyle Restaurant Group LLC and Hussein Govani
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 605
J&J Sports Productions Inc v. Homestyle Restaurant Group LLC et al
as 2:2013cv00506
Plaintiff:
J&J Sports Productions Inc
Defendant:
Homestyle Restaurant Group LLC and Hussein Govani
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 605 Federal Communications Act of 1983
Schadee v. Maldonado et al
as 3:2012cv00614
Plaintiff:
Sean Schadee
Defendant:
Maldonado, Quiros, Faucher and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
COACH, INC. et al v. GOVANI LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY et al
as 2:2010cv06290
Plaintiff:
COACH, INC. and COACH SERVICES, INC.
Defendant:
GOVANI LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY, ROBERT HOMSI, RANIA DAHLAN and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1114
White v. Wong
as 3:2010cv04697
Petitioner:
Govani White
Respondent:
Robert K. Wong
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
USA v. Carlos Hernandez-Diaz
as 10-40732
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
CARLOS GOVANI HERNANDEZ-DIAZ, also known as Carlos Geovani Hernandez, also known as Carlos Geovani Hernandez-Diaz
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
