Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Williams v. Brown
as 4:2023cv02459
Petitioner:
Anthony Gregg Williams
Respondent:
Sheriff Marian Brown
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Williams v. La Perla North America, Inc.
as 3:2023cv01633
Plaintiff:
Gregg Williams
Defendant:
La Perla North America, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Paulson v. Unknown Defendant
as 5:2023cv00289
Plaintiff:
Gregg William Paulson
Defendant:
Unknown Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Williams v. Green et al
as 3:2018cv03200
Plaintiff:
Gregg Williams
Defendant:
Ameritek, Inc. and Michael Green
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Green v. Pro Football Inc. et al
as 8:2013cv01961
Plaintiff:
Barrett Green
Defendant:
Pro Football Inc. , Robert Royal and Gregg Williams
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Labor/Mgmnt. Relatio
Payne et al v. Corrections Corporation of America et al
as 1:2009cv00720
Plaintiff:
Richard Kelly Payne and Barbara Ann Roy
Defendant:
Corrections Corporation of America, CCA of Tennessee, LLC, Karl King and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Hicks v. Jones, et al
as 08-7097
Plaintiff - Appellant:
BILLY MONROE HICKS
Defendant - Appellee:
JUSTIN JONES, EDWARD EVANS, Warden, GREGG WILLIAMS and others
Hicks v. Jones et al
as 6:2008cv00228
Plaintiff:
Billy Monroe Hicks
Defendant:
Justin Jones, Edward Evens, Gregg Williams and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
360 Electrical et al v. Chong et al
as 2:2008cv00378
Plaintiff:
360 Electrical, 360 Electrical, Intelliglobe and others
Defendant:
Shui Hung Chong, O Yat, Go-2 and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Hicks v Jones
as 6:2008cv00150
Plaintiff:
Billy Monroe Hicks
Defendant:
Justin Jones, Marty Sirmons, Bobby Boone and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
