Cases 1 - 10 of 26
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2026cv01592
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Halperin et al v. 3M Company, f/k/a Minnesota Mining and Manufacturing Company et al
as 2:2025cv11791
Plaintiff:
Guy Halperin, Jayson Halpin, Robert Halston and others
Defendant:
3M Company, f/k/a Minnesota Mining and Manufacturing Company, AGC Chemicals Americas Inc., Amerex and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Harrison v. Holzapfel
as 5:2024cv00681
Petitioner:
Gregory Harrison
Respondent:
Warden Holzapfel
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Harrison v. Collier et al
as 2:2024cv00127
Defendant:
TDCJ Jordan Unit, Tammy Shelby, Aventiv Technologies and others
Plaintiff:
Gregory Harrison and Gregory Jay Harrison
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Harrison v. United States of America
as 5:2023cv05003
Plaintiff:
Gregory Harrison
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
Harrison v. Director, TDCJ-CID
as 2:2021cv00148
Petitioner:
Gregory Harrison
Respondent:
Director, TDCJ Bobby Lumpkin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Harrison v. Lumpkin
as 4:2021cv02362
Petitioner:
Gregory Harrison
Respondent:
Director TDCJ Bobby Lumpkin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
United States v. Gregory Harrison
as 21-1962
Defendant / Appellant:
Gregory Harrison
Plaintiff / Appellee:
United States of America
US v. Bruce Harrison, III
as 21-6377
Defendant / Appellant:
BRUCE GREGORY HARRISON, III
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
HARRISON v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 8:2020cv28046
Plaintiff:
GREGORY HARRISON
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
