Cases 31 - 40 of 61
HILL v. COLVIN
as 2:2014cv06821
Plaintiff:
GREGORY HILL
Defendant:
CAROLYN W. COLVIN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Gregory Hill v. Bert Bell/Pete Rozelle NFL
as 14-41159
Plaintiff - Appellant:
GREGORY HILL
Defendant - Appellee:
BERT BELL/PETE ROZELLE NFL PLAYER RETIREMENT PLAN
Boyd County, et al v. Merscorp, Inc., et al
as 14-5647
Plaintiff - Appellant:
BOYD COUNTY, ex rel Phillip Hedrick as County Attorney, BREATHITT COUNTY, ex rel Brendon Miller as County Attorney, CARTER COUNTY, ex rel Patrick Flannery as County Attorney and others
Defendant - Appellee:
MERSCORP, INC., MORTGAGE ELECTRONIC REGISTRATION SYSTEM, INC., MERSCORP HOLDINGS, INC. and others
USA v. Gregory Wilson
as 14-16001
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
GREGORY WILSON, AKA Gregory Hill
HeritageBank of the South v. Anderson Lake Partners, LLC et al
as 3:2013cv00372
Plaintiff:
HeritageBank of the South
Defendant:
Anderson Lake Partners, LLC, Roger D. McCreless, Glynn E. Smith and others
Cause Of Action: 12 U.S.C. § 1819 Default of Promissory Note
Hill v. Bert Bell/Pete Rozelle NFL Player Retirement Plan
as 4:2013cv00074
Plaintiff:
Gregory Hill
Defendant:
Bert Bell/Pete Rozelle NFL Player Retirement Plan
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
HILL v. MCCULLOUGH et al
as 1:2012cv00135
Plaintiff:
GREGORY HILL
Defendant:
ELBERT D MCCULLOUGH, FURNITURE ROW EXPRESS LLC and HARTFORD FIRE INSURANCE COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Hill v. Hallmark Cleaners, Inc.
as 3:2012cv00430
Plaintiff:
Gregory Hill
Defendant:
Hallmark Cleaners, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Daly et al V. City of Newton
as 1:2012cv11101
Plaintiff:
John M. Daly , Michael Abbruzzese , Russell Adam and others
Defendant:
City of Newton
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2
Hill v. Astrue
as 1:2012cv02734
Defendant:
Michael J. Astrue
Plaintiff:
Gregory Hill
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
