Cases 31 - 40 of 3,052
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00864
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Race)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00192
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12131 Americans with Disabilities
Davis et al v. Berrien, County of et al
as 1:2024cv00088
Plaintiff:
Melvin Davis, Sr., Charase Dorsey, Anisha Bird and others
Defendant:
Berrien, County of, Steve Pierangeli, Mark Sanford and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Other Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2024cv00234
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Job Discrimination (Race)
Martinez (PS) v. Bagwell et al
as 1:2024cv00206
Plaintiff:
Carlos R. Martinez
Defendant:
Kelly Bagwell, Chris Bina, J. F. Williams and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Walton v. Grimes et al
as 2:2024cv00111
Plaintiff:
Tobias Walton
Defendant:
Scott Daniel Grimes and Pilot Travel Centers, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Personal Injury
Perez v. Evans et al
as 1:2024cv00356
Plaintiff:
Eric Andrew Perez
Defendant:
Dr. Neil C. Evans, John or Jane Doe System Administrator, Shanay Webster and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 pi Diversity-Personal Injury
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 0:2024cv00044
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Grimes v. USA
as 6:2023cv06738
Petitioner:
Elston Grimes, Jr.
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Grimes Rock, Inc. v. Federal Mine Safety and Health Review Commission
as 23-4418
Petitioner:
GRIMES ROCK, INC.
Respondent:
FEDERAL MINE SAFETY AND HEALTH REVIEW COMMISSION
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
