Cases 31 - 40 of 78
GROAT v. BOSTON HEART DIAGNOSTICS CORPORATION et al
as 1:2015cv00487
Defendant:
BOSTON HEART DIAGNOSTICS CORPORATION and HEALTH DIAGNOSTIC LABORATORIES INCORPORATED
Plaintiff:
GROAT and TINA D. GROAT
Interested Party:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Amicus Curiae:
AMERICAN CLINICAL LABORATORY ASSOCIATION
Cause Of Action: 31 U.S.C. § 3729
Harrison v. Alabama Department of Corrections(INMATE2)
as 2:2015cv00066
Plaintiff:
Christopher Harrison
Defendant:
Alabama Department of Corrections, Bullock Correctional Facility, Warden Jones and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Davis-Hussung v. Lewis et al
as 2:2014cv14964
Plaintiff:
Romel Lee Davis-Hussung
Defendant:
Lewis, Gilerson, 800 Unit ARUS Buczek and others
Freeman v. Hamilton et al
as 2:2014cv13873
Plaintiff:
Joseph Gerald Freeman
Defendant:
A Hamilton , Kenneth Groat , Wyandotte, City of and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Fizer v. Rivard et al
as 2:2014cv13198
Plaintiff:
Javonte Fizer
Defendant:
Steve Rivard, Mark Olsen, Jill Scott and others
Dawson v. Murdock et al
as 5:2014cv13152
Plaintiff:
Terry Dawson
Defendant:
K. Murdock, Steve Rivard, T Ellison and others
Groat v. Howmedica Osetonics et al
as 0:2014cv02545
Plaintiff:
Barbara Groat
Defendant:
Howmedica Osetonics, Stryker Corp., Stryker Sales Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
United States of America v. Sturgis
as 14-1578
Appellee USA:
United States of America
Defendant:
James A. Wiggins, Kenneth C. Smith, AKA Meatball, AKA Meat, Levon Sturgis, AKA Man and others
Defendant - Appellant:
Albert L. Sturgis
Groat v. Howmedica Osteonics et al
as 0:2014cv00387
Plaintiff:
Barbara Groat
Defendant:
Howmedica Osteonics, Stryker Corp., Stryker Sales Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Groat v. Coursey
as 2:2014cv00118
Respondent:
Rick Coursey
503) 947-4794 (fax:
Lynn David Larsen
Petitioner:
Ronald C. Groat
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
