Cases 1 - 10 of 18
Defenders of Wildlife et al v. Boyles et al
as 2:2022cv00112
Plaintiff:
Defenders of Wildlife and South Carolina Coastal Conservation League
Defendant:
Robert H Boyles, Jr, Blaik Keppler, Melvin Bell and others
Cause Of Action: 16 U.S.C. § 1538 Endangered Species Act
RP Golden State Management, LLC et al v. Boyle et al
as 1:2020cv01479
Plaintiff:
RP Golden State Management, LLC, Asha Desai and Paul Desai
Defendant:
JonesTurner Law, Stephen H. Boyle, Hinshaw & Culberston LLP and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
BOYLES v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 8:2020cv02135
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM H BOYLES
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2018cv10006
Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Juan Diaz, Jr. v. Warden Lewisburg USP, et al
as 14-4041
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JUAN DIAZ, JR.
Defendant - Appellee:
WARDEN LEWISBURG USP, REGIONAL MEDICAL DIRECTOR, Name Unknown, H.S.A. S BROWN and others
Sykes v. O'Brien et al
as 3:2013cv00084
Plaintiff:
Terrance Sykes, Jr.
Defendant:
Terry O'Brien, John Doe, Christopher Goisse and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Tarone Jones v. US
as 13-6497
Plaintiff - Appellant:
TARONE M. JONES
Defendant - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, WARDEN JAMES CROSS, J. E. CROGAN, Associate Warden and others
Diaz v. Holder et al
as 1:2012cv02507
Plaintiff:
Juan Diaz, Jr.
Defendant:
Eric Holder, Charles Samuels, Jr., Harrell Watts and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Scott v. Chipps et al
as 2:2012cv00068
Plaintiff:
Larry Dewayne Scott
Defendant:
Tammy L Chipps, M Wiener, H Boyle and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Scott v. Chipps et al
as 2:2012cv02549
Plaintiff:
Larry Dewayne Scott
Defendant:
Tammy L Chipps, M Wiener, H Boyle and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
