Cases 1 - 10 of 951
Hadley et al v. Abbott Laboratories et al
as 1:2024cv05102
Plaintiff:
Tamika Hadley and Gabriel Hadley
Defendant:
Abbott Laboratories, Mead Johnson Nutrition Company and Mead Johnson & Company LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
REED v. BARNES et al
as 3:2024cv01500
Plaintiff:
KIMBERLY REED
Defendant:
JONATHAN BARNES, CHARONNE HADLEY, UBER TECHNOLOGIES, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00086
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv01486
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Hadley v. Bayer CropScience LP et al
as 1:2024cv04094
Plaintiff:
Kathleen Hadley
Defendant:
Bayer CropScience LP and Monsanto Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal
DHARIA v. THE UNITED STATES et al
as 2:2024cv05915
Plaintiff:
RAJESH DHARIA
Defendant:
THE UNITED STATES, FBI, DAVID HADLEY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Steward v. Hadley
as 2:2024cv00437
Plaintiff:
Joseph Saul Steward
Defendant:
Roger Hadley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Diamond State Insurance Company v. Hadley et al
as 4:2024cv00034
Plaintiff:
Diamond State Insurance Company
Defendant:
Sherika Hadley, Tarnell Ewing, Toddrico Bean and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Declaratory Judgment (Insurance)
Tennessee Gas Pipeline Company, L.L.C. v. 2.46 Acres in Dickson County, Tennessee et al
as 3:2024cv00483
Plaintiff:
Tennessee Gas Pipeline Company, L.L.C.
Defendant:
2.46 Acres in Dickson County, Tennessee, Donald L. Mixon, Willadean Ridley and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 717 Natural Gas Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
