Cases 21 - 30 of 51
Hampton v. Williams et al
as 3:2018cv03330
Plaintiff:
Gregory Hampton
Defendant:
Eddie Williams, RWI Transportation LLC and Moses Housman Mitchell
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Hampton v. Bob Evans Transportation Company, LLC et al
as 6:2018cv00143
Plaintiff:
Wendell D. Hampton
Defendant:
Bob Evans Transportation Company, LLC and Joe F. Morrison
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446
Warriner v. Hampton et al
as 4:2018cv00150
Plaintiff:
Tiffany A. Warriner
Defendant:
Melissa M. Hampton and State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 23 U.S.C. § 134
Owens et al v. Hart et al
as 3:2018cv00457
Plaintiff:
Bill Owens and Mandy Hampton Owens
Defendant:
Lawrence Edward Hart , Direct Transport Solutions Inc and TRL Leasing Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Thomas et al v. Singh et al
as 3:2017cv00182
Plaintiff:
Frances Thomas and Tyrone Davis Hampton
Defendant:
Gurpartap Singh and Transfarmer, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
HAMPTON v. HOPE et al
as 2:2016cv05217
Plaintiff:
ALICIA HAMPTON
Defendant:
MARK HOPE and MEAD JOHNSON NUTRITION COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1391
Hampton v. Reid et al
as 5:2016cv02976
Plaintiff:
David E Hampton, Jr
Defendant:
Lakeisha Reid and John Doe
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Hampton v.Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority
as 8:2016cv01499
Plaintiff:
Kalief A. Hampton
Defendant:
Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority and Albert Edwards
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Powell et al v. Barefoot Carriers Inc et al
as 3:2016cv00105
Plaintiff:
Brian K Powell and Kara M Powell
Defendant:
Barefoot Carriers Inc and Lydell Hampton
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
HAMPTON et al v. BIG G EXPRESS, INC. et al
as 1:2015cv01234
Defendant:
BIG G EXPRESS, INC. and RICHARD JONES
Plaintiff:
ABAGAIL HAMPTON and NATHANIAL HAMPTON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
