Cases 1 - 10 of 100
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2026cv01775
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans with Disabilities Act
Hall v. California Victim Compensation Board, et al.
as 26-7410
Defendant:
HASTING RANCH BRANCH LIBRARY, SANTA CATALINA BRANCH LIBRARY, LINDSEY REED, Director of the Woman Room and others
Plaintiff:
GWENDOLYN HALL
Hastings v. Uber Technologies, LLC et al
as 3:2026cv12477
Plaintiff:
Amanda Lynn Hastings
Defendant:
Uber Technologies, LLC, Raiser, LLC and Raiser-CA, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Libel,Assault,Slander
Piard v. Sorenson et al
as 4:2026cv40240
Plaintiff:
Joseph Piard
Defendant:
Raj Sorenson, Sergeant Shattuck, Clesely Garcia and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
James Murzike v. T. Ruleviteh, et al
as 26-13544
Plaintiff:
JAMES T. MURZIKE
Defendant:
T. RULEVITEH, J. TAYLOR, R. GREEN and others
Hastings v. Specialty Plating, Inc. et al
as 1:2026cv04823
Plaintiff:
Joyce C. Hastings Trust
Defendant:
Specialty Plating, Inc. and Valerie Hastings
Trustee:
Edwin Bryan Hastings
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 6901 Resource & Recovery Act
Woody v. Life Insurance Company of North America
as 1:2026cv01251
Plaintiff:
Hasting Woody
Defendant:
Life Insurance Company of North America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.
City of Hastings, Minnesota v. 3M Company
as 0:2026cv04113
Plaintiff:
City of Hastings, Minnesota
Defendant:
3M Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Petition for Removal
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2026cv00182
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Currier v. Jenkins et al
as 4:2026cv40207
Plaintiff:
Jeremy Currier
Defendant:
Shawn Jenkins, Kelly Hastings and Clemente Rivera
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
