Cases 1 - 10 of 100
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2026cv00182
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Currier v. Jenkins et al
as 4:2026cv40207
Plaintiff:
Jeremy Currier
Defendant:
Shawn Jenkins, Kelly Hastings and Clemente Rivera
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Anderson et al v. Tyson Foods, Inc.. et al
as 0:2026cv03745
Plaintiff:
Christopher Anderson, Michael Balette, Frank Bienek and others
Defendant:
Tyson Foods, Inc.., Tyson Fresh Meats Inc., JBS, S.A. and others
Cause Of Action: 07 U.S.C. § 181 Packers & Stockyard Act
Hastings v. U.S. Army Corps of Engineers et al
as 1:2026cv00109
Plaintiff:
Ted Hastings
Defendant:
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers and Colonel Phillip J. Valenti
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 0701 Maritime Subsidy Board
Hastings v. Nordic Energy Services, LLC
as 1:2026cv10118
Plaintiff:
Bradley Hastings
Defendant:
Nordic Energy Services, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Fraud
Nasakaitis v. Texas State University et al
as 1:2026cv02260
Plaintiff:
Jakob John Nasakaitis
Defendant:
Texas State University, Mary Brennan, Yasmine Beale-Rivaya and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2026cv09138
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 26-1874
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
AN et al v. DESPINS et al
as 1:2026cv09045
Plaintiff:
TAO AN, CHUNGANG GUAN, CUI QINGYUN and others
Defendant:
LUC A. DESPINS and PAUL HASTINGS LLP
Cause Of Action: Civil Miscellaneous Case
AN et al v. DESPINS et al
as 3:2026cv01212
Plaintiff:
TAO AN, CHUNGANG GUAN, CUI QINGYUN and others
Defendant:
LUC A. DESPINS and PAUL HASTINGS LLP
Cause Of Action: Civil Miscellaneous Case
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
