Cases 1 - 10 of 100
Macey v. Dicky
as 26-20394
Plaintiff:
Wallace Macey, Jr.
Defendant:
Wayne Dicky, Brazos County Sheriff, Cameron D. Reynolds, Defense Lawyer, Kyle Hawthorne, Judge, 85th District Court of Brazos County and others
Hawthorne v. Northview Village, Inc. et al
as 1:2026cv08352
Plaintiff:
Carolyn Hawthorne
Defendant:
Northview Village, Inc. d/b/a Northview Village Healthcare Accounting Services, LLC, and Northview Village Center Limited Partnership
Cause Of Action: Civil Miscellaneous Case
Hawthorne v. USA
as 2:2026cv00320
Petitioner:
Kyran Jujuan Hawthorne
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Hawthorne v. Benson
as 3:2026cv00767
Plaintiff:
Elijah L. Hawthorne
Defendant:
Xavius Benson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Baham v. City of Hawthorne
as 2:2026cv07551
Plaintiff:
Kelly Baham
Defendant:
City of Hawthorne
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Hoid v. KNOP-2 News, et al
as 26-1269
Plaintiff:
EDWARD HOID
Defendant:
KNOP-2 NEWS, JASON MALTERUD, Longmont Police Department, JOSHUA BURKE, Longmont Police Department and others
Hoid v. KNOP-2 News, et al
as 26-1263
Plaintiff:
EDWARD HOID
Defendant:
KNOP-2 NEWS, JASON MALTERUD, Longmont Police Department, JOSHUA BURKE, Longmont Police Department and others
In re: Hoid
as 26-4088
Petitioner:
In re: EDWARD HOID
Respondent:
KNOP-2 NEWS, JASON MALTERUD, Longmont Police Department, JOSHUA BURKE, Longmont Police Department and others
Craig, et al. v. Hawthorne Machinery Co., et al.
as 26-4086
Plaintiff:
ROGER S. CRAIG and UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, ex rel
Defendant:
HAWTHORNE MACHINERY CO., BRIAN VERHOEVEN, TEE NESS and others
Hickey v. Anderson et al
as 2:2026cv12136
Plaintiff:
Kainte Deshawn Hickey
Defendant:
William Anderson, III, Anthony Avecilla, Kenyatta Borden and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
