Cases 1 - 10 of 100
Hope v. Dotres et al
as 1:2026cv25019
Plaintiff:
Tarvaneisha M. Hope
Defendant:
Jose L. Dotres and Miami-Dade County Public Schools
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question
Smith v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2026cv00464
Plaintiff:
Jacquelynn Hope Smith
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1383 Review of HHS Decision
Hope v. PCDF et al
as 4:2026cv00743
Plaintiff:
Thomas Earl Hope
Defendant:
PCDF and ASP
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Other Civil Rights
Nebel v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 8:2026cv02113
Plaintiff:
Hope Nebel
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Estrada v. Hope Baking Company, Inc. et al
as 4:2026cv04058
Plaintiff:
Christopher Estrada
Defendant:
Hope Baking Company, Inc. and East Baking Company, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2101 Worker Adjustment and Retraining Notification Act
Ngehsi Newanforbi v. Smith et al
as 3:2026cv07504
Plaintiff:
Brendan Ngehsi Newanforbi
Defendant:
Shannon Smith and Hope Psychotherapy, Inc. a California corporation doing business as Hope Program
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Talton v. Meta Platforms, Inc. et al
as 4:2026cv07423
Plaintiff:
Hope Talton
Defendant:
Meta Platforms, Inc., Instagram, LLC, Facebook Payments, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
NLRB v. Healthy Minds
as 26-60551
Petitioner:
National Labor Relations Board
Respondent:
Healthy Minds, Incorporated, House of Hope of Bastrop, L.L.C., a Single Integrated Enterprise, Angela Nichols, Individual and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2026cv00685
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Job Discrimination (Race)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2026cv08337
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
