Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 85
In re: Howard Jones
as 26-163
Petitioner: In re: HOWARD JONES
JONES v. HAUSE et al
as 2:2026cv03064
Plaintiff: HOWARD JONES
Defendant: HENRY HAUSE, L. DURAND, JOSEPH TERRA and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Howard Jones Investments, LLC, et al. v. City of Sacramento, et al.
as 26-1618
Plaintiff: HOWARD JONES INVESTMENTS, LLC, LOWELLA OLDHAM, DOLLY LEEPER and others
Defendant: CITY OF SACRAMENTO, SACRAMENTO POLICE DEPARTMENT, MATT ARMSTRONG and others
Jones v. USA
as 4:2025cv00214
Petitioner: Howard Jones
Respondent: USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
Archelle et al v. 3M COMPANY, f/k/a Minesota Mining and Manufacturing Company et al
as 2:2025cv11998
Plaintiff: Jamie Archelle, Wanda Barker, John Bell and others
Defendant: 3M COMPANY, f/k/a Minesota Mining and Manufacturing Company, AGC CHEMICALS AMERICAS, INC., AMEREX CORPORATION and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Abreu Castillo et al v. 3M Company et al
as 2:2025cv11864
Defendant: 3M Company, Minnesota Mining and Manufacturing Co, AGC Chemicals Americas Inc and others
Plaintiff: Robert Abreu Castillo, Vanessa Aguayo, Sharon Alexander and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
In re: Howard Jones
as 25-166
Petitioner: In re: HOWARD JONES
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2025cv00426
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Emmerich Newspapers, Inc. et al v. Mississippi River Commission We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 5:2024cv00087
Defendant: Mississippi River Commission
Plaintiff: Howard Jones and Emmerich Newspapers, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552 Freedom of Information Act
US v. Howard Jones We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 24-6765
Defendant: HOWARD JONES
Plaintiff: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?