Cases 1 - 10 of 58
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv01374
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Michael Owlfeather-Gorbey v. Mohamed Mubarek
as 24-6362
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL S. GORBEY
Defendant:
MUBAREK, Doctor, TOM GERA, P.A., VANMETER, Nurse and others
Rios-Mulero v. Bantleit et al
as 1:2023cv00137
Plaintiff:
Anibal A. Rios-Mulero
Defendant:
FNU Bantleit, FNU Doabs, HSS Franks Medical and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv02409
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
HSS Inc. v. Evolution Consulting, LLC
as 1:2022cv01854
Plaintiff:
HSS Inc.
Defendant:
Evolution Consulting, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Contract Dispute
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2022cv00477
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal-Employment Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 22-1148
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
HSS-Fulton, LLC v. Steadfast Insurance Company et al
as 1:2021cv03421
Plaintiff:
HSS-Fulton, LLC
Defendant:
Steadfast Insurance Company, Starr Surplus Lines Insurance Company, Allied World Assurance Company and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
CLYDE ASSOCIATES, LLC v. MCKESSON CORPORATION
as 2:2019cv21933
Plaintiff:
CLYDE ASSOCIATES, LLC
Defendant:
MCKESSON CORPORATION and UNIVAR SOLUTIONS USA INC.
3Rd Party Defendant:
HSS HOLDINGS, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Loxley Evolution Technology Co., Ltd. v. HSS Development Group LTD. et al
as 1:2021cv05096
Plaintiff:
Loxley Evolution Technology Co., Ltd.
Defendant:
HSS Development Group LTD. and HSS Administrative Services Co. Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
