Cases 1 - 10 of 55
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv00305
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Swinson v. Hubbell Incorporated et al
as 2:2024cv04035
Plaintiff:
Ernest Antoine Swinson
Defendant:
Hubbell Incorporated, Kristen Thomure, Jamie Haines and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Ernest Swinson v. IUE-CWA Local 86821, et al
as 24-1084
Plaintiff:
Ernest Antoine Swinson
Defendant:
IUE-CWA Local 86821, Union, Jessie Montgomery, IUE-CWA Local 86821 President/Safety Rep, Hubbell Power Systems, Sr. HR Rep. and others
Swinson v. IUE-CWA Local 86821 et al
as 2:2023cv04230
Plaintiff:
Ernest Antoine Swinson
Defendant:
IUE-CWA Local 86821, Jessie Montgomery, Hubbell Power Systems and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Bossio-Haines v. Kijakazi
as 4:2022cv01335
Plaintiff:
Malissa Bossio-Haines
Defendant:
Kilolo Kijakazi
Interested Party:
SSA Office of General Counsel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Haines v. McFadden et al
as 4:2022cv00847
Plaintiff:
David Haines
Defendant:
McFadden, Robinson, Daniels and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Yang et al v. City of Minneapolis et al
as 0:2021cv02658
Plaintiff:
Mai Yang Yang, Hailee Vue, Nou Vue and others
Defendant:
City of Minneapolis, John Delmonico, Richard Jackson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Smith et al v. The Hain Celestial Group, Inc.
as 4:2021cv00129
Defendant:
The Hain Celestial Group, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Katesha Smith and Miranda Fogle
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Haines v. Heinricy
as 3:2019cv03047
Petitioner:
Leroy Dean Haines
Respondent:
Mike Heinricy
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2019cv05108
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
