Cases 31 - 40 of 94
Steven Hank v. Great Lakes Construction Co, et al
as 19-3118
Defendant / Appellee:
LOCAL 18 INTERNATIONAL UNION OF OPERATING ENGINEERS, GREAT LAKES CONSTRUCTION COMPANY and CARE WORKS CONSULTING, INC.
Plaintiff / Appellant:
STEVEN M. HANK
Diversified Southern Production LLC v. Johnson
as 7:2019cv00011
Defendant:
Hank Johnson
Plaintiff:
Diversified Southern Production LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Savoca v. O'Neill et al
as 1:2019cv00014
Defendant:
Josh Hank, Jack Remally, Gary Arbeswsek and others
Plaintiff:
Thomas James Savoca
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Todd v. Rich et al
as 1:2018cv00076
Defendant:
Dodds f/n/u, Eric Bryant, Rhonda Staggs and others
Plaintiff:
Xavier Shemod Todd
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Urrutia Santos v. China Inn South Express, LLC
as 1:2018cv01009
Defendant:
CHINA INN SOUTH EXPRESS, LLC, Jane Doe and Hank Yeh
Plaintiff:
Benigno Urrutia Santos
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Nixon v. Gibson et al
as 5:2018cv01429
Plaintiff:
David A. Nixon
Defendant:
Hank T. Gibson and Portage County Adult Probation Dept.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Latimer v. City of Detroit et al
as 2:2018cv11654
Plaintiff:
Lonzell Latimer
Defendant:
City of Detroit , Ahmed Haidar (#0022), J. Jackson (#0640) and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ray v. Bristol-Myers Squibb Company et al
as 5:2018cv00345
Plaintiff:
Hank Ray
Defendant:
Bristol-Myers Squibb Company, AstraZeneca Pharmaceuticals LP and McKesson Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Colbert v. Lindamoon et al
as 1:2018cv00030
Plaintiff:
Casey Leon Colbert
Defendant:
Cherry Lindamoon, Michael Neilsen, Tyler Barnett and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Nan Hanks & Associates, Inc. v. The Original Footwear Company, Inc. (PLR2)
as 1:2018cv00040
Plaintiff:
Nan Hanks & Associates, Inc.
Defendant:
The Original Footwear Company, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1330
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
