Cases 11 - 20 of 393
Weber v. The Standard Fire Insurance Company
as 2:2023cv02204
Plaintiff:
Sherry Hardesty Weber
Defendant:
The Standard Fire Insurance Company and Standard Fire Insurance Company
Interested Party:
Hurricane Ida Program Administrator
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Insurance Contract
Wrobel v. Hardesty et al
as 2:2023cv00969
Plaintiff:
Anthony Wrobel
Defendant:
Hardesty, Parraquirre, Cadish and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
HARDESTY v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2023cv13295
Plaintiff:
ANDREW HARDESTY
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
THOMPSON v. HOLCOMB et al
as 2:2023cv00272
Plaintiff:
JOHN THOMPSON
Defendant:
C. HOLCOMB, KEYES, ASHBA and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hardesty v. Ta et al
as 9:2023cv00046
Plaintiff:
Andrew Lenard Hardesty
Defendant:
Diane Ta, Mark Roberts, Donald Munoz and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
HARDESTY v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2023cv04734
Plaintiff:
BRANDON HARDESTY
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2023cv00037
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Hardesty v. Director, TDCJ-CID
as 6:2023cv00067
Petitioner:
Andrew Lenard Hardesty
Respondent:
Director, TDCJ-CID and Bobby Lumpkin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Hardesty v. Director, TDCJ-CID
as 6:2023cv00058
Petitioner:
Andrew Lenard Hardesty
Respondent:
Director, TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Hardesty-Glavey v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 5:2022cv02324
Plaintiff:
Brandi Hardesty-Glavey
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security Administration and Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 425 Social Security Benefits
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
