Cases 51 - 60 of 863
Arthur Hairston, Sr. v. Harley Lappin
as 12-2899
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ARTHUR L. HAIRSTON, SR.
Defendant - Appellee:
HARLEY LAPPIN, FROP and HARRELL WATTS
Defendant - Numerous Parties See Appellee:
JOHN NASH
Kirby v. Lappin et al
as 1:2012cv01703
Petitioner:
Damian M. Kirby
Respondent:
Harley Lappin and Garcia
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Roark v. Individuals of the Federal Bureau of Prisons, former and current et al
as 5:2012cv00060
Plaintiff:
Benjamin A Roark
Defendant:
Individuals of the Federal Bureau of Prisons, former and current, Eric Holder, Alberto Gonzales and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Scott v. Lappin et al
as 1:2012cv01048
Petitioner:
Cedrick Scott
Respondent:
Harley Lappin, Eric Holder and B.A. Bledsoe
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Brisbane v. Lappin et al
as 1:2012cv01557
Plaintiff:
George H. Brisbane
Defendant:
Harley Lappin , Ike Eichenlaub and J. F. Caraway
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Givens v. Thomas et al
as 3:2012cv00874
Petitioner:
Charles Edward Givens
Respondent:
J. Thomas, Harley Lappin and Department of Justice
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Walker v. Schult et al
as 12-1806
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Ellis Walker
Defendant - Appellee:
Deborah G. Schult, Warden, FCI Ray Brook, Russell Perdue, Warden, FCI Ray Brook, David Salamy, Unit Manager, FCI Ray Brook and others
Fernando Bustillo v. Harley Lappin, et al
as 12-2019
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Fernando Bustillo
Defendant - Appellee:
Harley Lappin, Med.Director Newton Kending, Michael K. Nelley and others
Aguilar v. Hall et al
as 6:2012cv00026
Petitioner:
Jose Luis Aguilar
Respondent:
Keith Hall, Eric Holder and Harley Lappin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Darrell DeBrew v. Brandon Brook
as 12-6583
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DARRELL JAMES DEBREW
Defendant - Appellee:
BRANDON BROOKS, P. COLLINS, LIEUTENANT DODSON and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
