Cases 21 - 30 of 2,707
Clum v. Harrison
as 2:2024cv02172
Petitioner:
David Clum, Jr.
Respondent:
C. Harrison
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Dea'Shawn Harrison v. Alan Wilson
as 24-6242
Plaintiff:
DEA'SHAWN HARRISON
Defendant:
ALAN WILSON, Attorney General of South Carolina and THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA
Clinton v. Harrison
as 2:2024cv02171
Petitioner:
Gregory Keith Clinton
Respondent:
Harrison
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
HARRISON-EL v. LILLER et al
as 2:2024cv01166
Plaintiff:
ALI A.I. HARRISON-EL
Defendant:
JUDGE CHARISSA J. LILLER, THOMAS GANNON, BUCKS COUNTY CRIMINAL JUSTICE CENTER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jones #529086 v. Juarez et al
as 1:2024cv00256
Plaintiff:
James Jones #529086 and PREA Victim
Defendant:
Unknown Juarez, Nathan Brooke, Riccardo Harrison and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Trujillo v. Harrison
as 2:2024cv02161
Petitioner:
Paul Trujillo
Respondent:
Warden Harrison
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Favre v. Harrison County, MS
as 24-60114
Plaintiff:
Noah Don Favre
Defendant:
Harrison County, Mississippi, Troy Peterson, Sheriff, MBN Agents, ABC to be named and others
HARRISON et al v. HARRY et al
as 1:2024cv00070
Plaintiff:
PLATINUM HODDIE HARRISON and NIARA BURTON
Defendant:
LAUREL R. HARRY and SUPERINTENDENT PATRICIA THOMPSON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Marcus Terrell v. Warden Dooly State Prison, et al
as 24-10577
Plaintiff:
MARCUS ANTHONY TERRELL
Defendant:
WARDEN DOOLY STATE PRISON, PAUL, LUCAS and others
Padgett v. Slatery
as 2:2024cv00033
Plaintiff:
Garner Dwight Padgett
Defendant:
Herbert Harrison Slatery, III
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
