Cases 1 - 10 of 100
Head v. Morris
as 4:2026cv01155
Petitioner:
Andrew Allen Wayne Head
Respondent:
Warden Kelly Morris
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Donahue, et al. v. Google LLC, et al.
as 26-4615
Plaintiff:
BLEU BLAZE DONAHUE
Defendant:
GOOGLE LLC, ALPHABET INC., SUNDAR PICHAI and others
Debtor:
DOES, 1-#
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2026cv01277
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2026cv01671
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Yang v. United States of America, et al.
as 26-4464
Plaintiff:
PEI-YU YANG
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, BRIAN P. SALT, Head Marshal, PHAM, Head Marshal and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2026cv01241
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
STRONG v. REED et al
as 1:2026cv01490
Plaintiff:
MARWIN DAVELLE STRONG
Defendant:
REED, BURGESS, GUNTEL and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Williams v. Riverbend Maximum Security Institution et al
as 3:2026cv00960
Plaintiff:
Cedrick A. Williams
Defendant:
Riverbend Maximum Security Institution, Tennessee Department of Correction, Acting Unit Manager f/n/u Fleshman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Brimacombe et al v. Miller et al
as 2:2026cv04845
Plaintiff:
E Bruce Brimacombe, Edward Bruce Brimacombe, Craig McClure and others
Defendant:
William Russell Miller, John Nardin, Deserie Ernst and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962 Racketeering (RICO) Act
North v. Hammer Head Security Systems LLC
as 2:2026cv02389
Plaintiff:
Dejuan North
Defendant:
Hammer Head Security Systems LLC
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
