Cases 31 - 40 of 50
Pharmaceutical Research and Manufacturers of America v. Cochran et al
as 1:2021cv00198
Defendant:
Norris Cochran, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Diana Espinosa and others
Plaintiff:
Pharmaceutical Research and Manufacturers of America
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 0701
Pharmaceutical Research and Manufacturers of America v. Cochran et al
as 8:2021cv00198
Defendant:
Norris Cochran, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Diana Espinosa and others
Plaintiff:
Pharmaceutical Research and Manufacturers of America
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 0701
NOVO NORDISK INC. et al v. UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES et al
as 3:2021cv00806
Defendant:
ROBERT P. CHARROW, THOMAS J. ENGELS, ALEX M. AZAR, II and others
Plaintiff:
NOVO NORDISK PHARMA, INC. and NOVO NORDISK INC.
Intervenor:
ASSOCIATION OF AMERICAN MEDICAL COLLEGES, 340B HEALTH, AMERICAN SOCIETY OF HEALTH-SYSTEM PHARMACISTS and others
Interested Party:
ACTING U.S. AG JEFFREY A. ROSEN and U.S. ATTORNEY OFFICE FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2005
SANOFI-AVENTIS U.S., LLC v. UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES et al
as 3:2021cv00634
Defendant:
ROBERT P. CHARROW, THOMAS J. ENGELS, ALEX M. AZAR II and others
Plaintiff:
SANOFI-AVENTIS U.S., LLC
Amicus Curiae:
ASSOCIATION OF AMERICAN MEDICAL COLLEGES, NOVO NORDISK INC., AMERICAN SOCIETY OF HEALTH-SYSTEM PHARMACISTS and others
Intervenor:
NATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF CHILDREN'S HOSPITALS d/b/a CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL ASSOCIATION
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
ELI LILLY AND COMPANY et al v. HEALTH RESOURCES AND SERVICES ADMINISTRATION, et al
as 1:2021cv00081
Defendant:
ROBERT P. CHARROW, THOMAS J. ENGELS, ALEX M. AZAR, II and others
Plaintiff:
ELI LILLY AND COMPANY and LILLY USA, LLC
Intervenor:
The Children's Hospital Association, 340B HEALTH, THEAMERICIAN HOSPITAL ASSOCIATION and others
Amicus Curiae:
NATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF COMMUNITY HEALTH CENTERS, LITTLE RIVERS HEALTH CARE INC, RYAN WHITE CLINICS FOR 340B ACCESS and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Declaratory Judgement
AstraZeneca Pharmaceuticals LP v. Azar et al
as 1:2021cv00027
Defendant:
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Robert P. Charrow, Thomas J. Engels and others
Plaintiff:
AstraZeneca Pharmaceuticals LP
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702
Adventist Health System/SunBelt, Inc. et al v. United States Department of Health and Human Services et al
as 3:2020cv00101
Defendant:
United Network for Organ Sharing, Thomas J. Engels, The University of Alabama Hospital and others
Plaintiff:
University of Iowa, Medical University Hospital Authority, University of Kansas Hospital Authority and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 0706
RYAN WHITE CLINICS FOR 340B ACCESS et al v. AZAR et al
as 1:2020cv02906
Defendant:
THOMAS J. ENGELS, ALEX M. AZAR, II, DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES and others
Plaintiff:
RYAN WHITE CLINICS FOR 340B ACCESS, CHATTANOOGA C.A.R.E.S. doing business as CEMPA COMMUNITY CARE, MATTHEW 25 AIDS SERVICES, INC. and others
Petitioner:
NATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF CHAIN DRUG STORES, INC., ASTRAZENECA LP, SANOFI-AVENTIS U.S. LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 0706
Genesis HealthCare, Inc. v. Alex Azar, II
as 20-1701
Plaintiff / Appellant:
GENESIS HEALTHCARE, INC.
Defendant / Appellee:
GEORGE SIGOUNAS, as Administrator of the Health Resources and Services Administration, KRISTA PEDLEY, as Captain in the United States Public Health Service and Director of the Office of Pharmacy Affairs in the Health Resources and Services Administration and ALEX M. AZAR, II, as Secretary of the United States Department of Health and Human Services
Meyer v. United States Department of Health & Human Services
as 2:2018cv02380
Defendant:
United States Department of Health & Human Services and United States Department of Health and Human Services, Health Resources and Services Administration, Bureau of Health Workforce
Plaintiff:
Sarah Meyer
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
