Cases 1 - 9 of 9
CHANDLER v. JOHNSON & JOHNSON et al
as 3:2023cv14362
Plaintiff:
HEATHER CHANDLER
Defendant:
JOHNSON & JOHNSON, JOHNSON & JOHNSON CONSUMER, INC., LTL MANAGEMENT, LLC and others
In Re:
JOHNSON & JOHNSON TALCUM POWDER PRODUCTS MARKETING, SALES PRACTICES, AND PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Chandler v. Abner et al
as 2:2020cv01115
Defendant:
Petstop School of Dog Grooming LLC, Bia's Dog Grooming LLC, Arabia Abner and others
Plaintiff:
Heather Chandler
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 206
Chandler v. Abner et al
as 2:2020cv00352
Defendant:
John Abner, Petstop School of Dog Grooming LLC, Bia's Dog Grooming LLC and others
Plaintiff:
Heather Chandler
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Chandler-Schultheis v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 9:2019cv81370
Plaintiff:
Heather Chandler-Schultheis
Defendant:
ANDREW M SAUL and Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 0405
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2014cv04719
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 621 Job Discrimination (Age)
Chandler v. Cook Incorporated et al
as 2:2014cv01714
Plaintiff:
Heather Chandler
Defendant:
Cook Incorporated , Cook Biotech, Inc. and Cook Medical, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
MACKALL et al v. CATHEDRAL TRUSTEES INC. et al
as 1:2010cv00339
Defendant:
GREG BAMRICK, BRYAN BANSCHBACH, MARC BEHRINGER and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1964 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Houston v. Sysco's Food Service, Inc. et al
as 1:2010cv00316
Plaintiff:
Johnathan M. Houston
Defendant:
Sysco's Food Service, Inc., Fresh Point Produce (Atlanta), Bob Massave and others
Houston v. Sysco's Food Service, Inc. et al
as 1:2009mi00495
Plaintiff:
Johnathan M. Houston
Defendant:
Sysco's Food Service, Inc., Fresh Point Produce (Atlanta), Bob Massave and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Type:
Other Statutes
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
