Cases 41 - 50 of 50
Hector Flores v. Michael J. Astrue
as 2:2010cv09697
Defendant:
Michael J. Astrue
Plaintiff:
Hector Flores
Hector Flores-Carrillo v. Eric Holder, Jr.
as 10-1912
Petitioner:
HECTOR G. FLORES-CARRILLO, also know as HECTOR FLORES-CARRILLO
Respondent:
ERIC H. HOLDER, JR., Attorney General of the United States
Cameto Rodriguez v. United States of America et al
as 1:2009cv23557
Plaintiff:
Luis A Cameto Rodriguez
Defendant:
United States of America, Rocha, Getchell and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 State Prisoner Civil Rights
Richard Risher v. Harvey Lappin, et al
as 09-5370
Plaintiff - Appellant:
RICHARD CARLTON RISHER
Defendant:
HARVEY LAPPIN, BOP Director, et al
Defendant - Appellee:
NAHEM A. NAIMEY, FCI Memphis Clinical Director, E. J. PRINCE, FCI Memphis Chief Medical Officer, sued in their individial and official capacity, JACK JOINER, FCI Memphis Safety Manager and others
Flores v. Fox, et al
as 09-40159
Plaintiff - Appellant:
HECTOR FLORES
Defendant - Appellee:
JOHN FOX, Warden, GONZALEZ, Captain, G MALDONADO, JR., Regional Director and others
:
TERESA FLORES
Flores v. Outlaw
as 2:2008cv00108
Plaintiff:
Hector Flores
Defendant:
T C Outlaw
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Flores v. Fox et al
as 1:2008cv00285
Plaintiff:
Hector Flores
Defendant:
John Fox, UP Gonzalez, G Maldonado, Jr and others
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Flores v. Lappin et al
as 1:2008cv00202
Plaintiff:
Hector Flores
Defendant:
Harry Lappin, T C Outlaw, Unknown Perkins and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Flores v. Lappin et al
as 2:2008cv00045
Plaintiff:
Hector Flores
Defendant:
Harry Lappin, T C Outlaw, Perkins and others
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Risher v. Lappin et al
as 2:2008cv02038
Plaintiff:
Richard Carlton Risher
Defendant:
Harvey Lappin, Bruce Pearson, Sterling Dawson and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Personal Injury
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
