Cases 1 - 10 of 31,475
(PC) Thomas v. Castro et al
as 1:2024cv00507
Plaintiff:
Michael Thomas
Defendant:
J. Castro and Hernandez
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hernandez v. US Attorney General
as 2:2024cv11141
Plaintiff:
Phyllis L. Hernandez
Defendant:
US Attorney General
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00479
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
Christians in the Workplace Networking Group v. National Technology and Engineering Solutions, et al
as 24-2072
Plaintiff:
CHRISTIANS IN THE WORKPLACE NETWORKING GROUP
Defendant:
NATIONAL TECHNOLOGY AND ENGINEERING SOLUTIONS OF SANDIA, LLC, a wholly owned subsidiary of Honeywell International, Inc., ESTHER HERNANDEZ, Chief Diversity Officer of Sandia, AARON JIM, EEOC Specialist of Sandia and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv03525
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans With Disabilities Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv01040
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Reid v. The GEO Group, Inc. et al
as 3:2024cv00309
Plaintiff:
Admin Est Delisa Hernandez Reid
Defendant:
The GEO Group, Inc., Nurse Delisa Jordan, Nurse Merian Kamara and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv03152
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Monjarrez-Hernandez v. Garland
as 24-1130
Petitioner:
BELINDA ARACELY MONJARREZ-HERNANDEZ
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, UNITED STATES ATTORNEY GENERAL
Goldsboro v. Ivey et al
as 6:2024cv00810
Plaintiff:
Harry Lee Goldsboro, II
Defendant:
Wayne Ivey, Major Torquado, Jennifer Leca and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
