Cases 1 - 10 of 84
Hickson v. Haulcy
as 24-30165
Plaintiff:
Henry Hickson
Defendant:
Terrance Haulcy, Danny Henshaw, Captain Jones and others
Hickson v. Broomfield
as 1:2023cv03233
Petitioner:
Christopher A. Hickson
Respondent:
Ron Broomfield
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Hickson v. Haulcy et al
as 5:2023cv00378
Plaintiff:
Henry Hickson
Defendant:
Terrance Haulcy, Danny Henshaw, Capt Jones and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Reyes v. City of New York et al
as 1:2023cv00541
Plaintiff:
DeQuan Reyes
Defendant:
City of New York, Chief Charlton Lemon, Warden Jean Rene and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Williams v. City of New York et al
as 1:2022cv10537
Plaintiff:
Alexander Williams and Alexander Williams, Jr.
Defendant:
City of New York, Security Captain Ganies, C.O. K. Young and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
BEY v. BAYLSON
as 2:2022cv03917
Plaintiff:
JAMEEL HICKSON BEY
Defendant:
MICHAEL M. BAYLSON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Erwin (ID 123078) v. Zmuda et al
as 5:2022cv03170
Plaintiff:
Christopher Adam Erwin
Defendant:
Jeff Zmuda, Libby Keogh, Darcie Holthous and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Rodricus Scott v. Jared Akins, et al
as 22-12499
Plaintiff / Appellant:
RODRICUS D. SCOTT
Defendant / Appellee:
JARED AKINS, Statesboro Police Department, individual and official capacities, TYSHEA CHARDAE LEE, Grand Juror, FRANCES JEANETTE MONTERO, Grand Juror and others
Thompson v. CCA
as 2:2022cv01047
Plaintiff:
Kyle M Thompson and Kyle Matthew Thompson
Defendant:
CCA, CAFCC, A Hickson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Michael Hickson v. Warden, Ridgeland Correctional Institution
as 22-6253
Petitioner / Appellant:
MICHAEL HICKSON
Respondent / Appellee:
WARDEN, RIDGELAND CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
