Cases 21 - 30 of 125
Webb v. State Of Texas et al
as 3:2021cv00208
Plaintiff:
William T Webb
Defendant:
State Of Texas, GPD and Hitchcock TX PP
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hitchcock v. Town of Poestenkill, New York et al
as 1:2021cv00758
Plaintiff:
Joseph Hitchcock
Defendant:
Town of Poestenkill, New York, Keith Hammond and Tracy Church
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Witt v. Johnson et al
as 3:2021cv00011
Defendant:
Brenda Johnson and Stevenson Hitchcock
Plaintiff:
Lenard Thomas Witt
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Diaz v. The Palm Beach Post Newspaper et al
as 9:2021cv80054
Plaintiff:
Joseph Thomas Diaz
Defendant:
Olivia Hitchcock and The Palm Beach Post Newspaper
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
(PS) Garcia v. City of Sacramento, California et al
as 2:2021cv00036
Plaintiff:
Daniel Carlos Garcia
Defendant:
Richard Hitchcock, Rick Braziel, John McGinness and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Nute v. Tyson et al
as 4:2020cv01920
Defendant:
Christopher Zito, Leah Hitchcock Braswell, Christina Corona and others
Plaintiff:
Anthony David Nute
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Assi v. Hanshaw et al
as 1:2020cv00839
Defendant:
Robert Bowles, John Chapman, Sheriff Jeffery S. Lawless and others
Plaintiff:
Hassan Adran Assi
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
CLYDE ARMORY INC, et al v. UNIFIED GOVERNMENT OF ATHENS-CLARKE COUNTY GEORGIA et al
as 3:2020cv00042
Defendant:
Blaine Williams, Judd Drake, Unified Government of Athens-Clarke County, Georgia and others
Plaintiff:
Clyde Armory, Inc., FAMILY CHIROPRACTIC OF ATHENS INC, CLYDE ARMORY INC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2020cv00070
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2020cv00036
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
