Cases 31 - 40 of 8,461
Holmes, Derrick v. Florida Department of Corrections
as 1:2024cv21335
Plaintiff:
Derrick Holmes
Defendant:
Florida Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Jaime v. New York State Department of Corrections et al
as 1:2024cv02758
Plaintiff:
Luis Jaime
Defendant:
New York State Department of Corrections, Klien, Officer L. Farr and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv02828
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Damper v. City Of Chicago et al
as 1:2024cv02869
Plaintiff:
Ray Timothy Damper
Defendant:
City Of Chicago, Sebastien A Magiera, J.D. Howard and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Holmes v. Indivior, Inc. et al.
as 1:2024sf65178
Plaintiff:
Jessica E. Holmes
Defendant:
Indivior, Inc., Indivior Solutions, Inc., Indivior PLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Holmes v. Freedom Mortgage Corporation
as 3:2024cv00099
Plaintiff:
Transel Chanta Holmes
Defendant:
Freedom Mortgage Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Account Receivable
Kuslits, John et al v. Brown, Nicole et al
as 3:2024cv00225
Plaintiff:
John Kuslits and Kendrick Dane Sellers
Defendant:
Nicole Brown, Maryah Martin, Denise Valerius and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Holmes v. Clayton County et al
as 1:2024cv01461
Plaintiff:
Vakelvion Holmes
Defendant:
Clayton County and Officer Justin Stephens
Coffelt v. White et al
as 7:2024cv00230
Plaintiff:
Joshua Clay Coffelt
Defendant:
Rick White, Holmes and Principle
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Roosevelt Smith v. Cell Search Team, et al
as 24-11006
Plaintiff:
ROOSEVELT SMITH
Defendant:
CELL SEARCH TEAM, DALE VAUGHN, BOBBY J. GREEN and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
