Cases 1 - 10 of 3,626
Hood-Anderson v. New Castle County, Delaware et al
as 1:2024cv01012
Defendant:
Sean Sweeney-Jones and New Castle County, Delaware
Plaintiff:
Trynity Hood-Anderson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
McCombs et al v. Brown et al
as 4:2024cv00202
Plaintiff:
Danielle Hood, Latia Williams and Thomas L. McCombs, II
Defendant:
Does I-V, Isaac Brown, ABC Entities I-V and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity of citizenship
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv06760
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12131 Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990
Hood v. Large et al
as 7:2024cv00602
Defendant:
Crystal Large, Brandy Mitchem and S.W.V.R.J.A-Tazewell Facility
Plaintiff:
Brandy N. Hood
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
HOOD v. WOMACK et al
as 1:2024cv01498
Defendant:
WOMACK and SOLOMAN
Plaintiff:
DERRICK HOOD
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Green v. Hood et al
as 5:2024cv00175
Defendant:
Brian Ghaphery, Assistant Prosecutor Christopher Hood, Lt. Clouston and others
Plaintiff:
Julian Lee Green
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
HOOD v. WARDEN et al
as 1:2024cv01446
Defendant:
EMERSON and WARDEN
Plaintiff:
DERRICK HOOD
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv01458
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
United States of America v. Hood et al
as 2:2024cv14207
Defendant:
PNC Bank, Brian Hood and Tracie Fassnacht
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346 Recovery of IRS Tax
HOOD v. PENDLETON CORRECTIONAL FACILITY
as 1:2024cv01435
Defendant:
PENDLETON CORRECTIONAL FACILITY
Plaintiff:
DERRICK HOOD
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
