Cases 21 - 30 of 63
Reppell et al v. Johnson & Johnson et al
as 4:2017cv01858
Plaintiff:
Brenda Reppell , Diana Abbate , Nancy Askew and others
Defendant:
Johnson & Johnson , Johnson & Johnson Consumer Companies, Inc. and Imerys Talc America, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Hooper et al v. 3M Company et al
as 0:2017cv02160
Plaintiff:
Michael Hooper and Mary Hooper
Defendant:
3M Company and Arizant Healthcare, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Hooper Corporation et al v. McCarthy et al
as 0:2017cv02145
Plaintiff:
Hooper Corporation and Wagner-Smith Equipment Company
Defendant:
Michael P. McCarthy and Direct Connect Transport, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 49 U.S.C. § 14706
Wright v. United States of America et al
as 3:2017cv03011
Plaintiff:
Keith L. Wright
Defendant:
United States of America, Oscar Rameriz, David Mackey and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Smoke v. Hooper et al
as 4:2016cv00766
Plaintiff:
Judy Smoke
Defendant:
Roger Hooper and Van Buren County, Arkansas
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Sprint Communications Company L.P. v. Hooper Corporation
as 4:2016cv01618
Plaintiff:
Sprint Communications Company L.P.
Defendant:
Hooper Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Lyons v. Moore et al
as 1:2016cv00145
Plaintiff:
Chandra Lyons
Defendant:
Moore, Holst, Babb and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Dale Stroud, et al v. Southwestern Energy Company, et al
as 15-3458
Plaintiff:
Robbie Hill, Gwenna Hill, Joseph Smith and others
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Dale Stroud and Kari Stroud
Defendant - Appellee:
Southwestern Energy Company and SEECO, Inc.
Defendant:
Chesapeake Energy and XTO Energy, Inc.
Hooper v. Jones et al
as 1:2015cv00075
Plaintiff:
Jacob S Hooper
Defendant:
Mindy Jones and Tate Lawrence
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lyons v. Williams et al
as 1:2015cv00053
Plaintiff:
Chandra Lyons
Defendant:
B Williams, Banks, Linda Dixon and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
