Cases 1 - 10 of 155
Morrow v. Collazo et al
as 1:2024cv02037
Plaintiff:
McKenzie Morrow
Defendant:
Angel O. Collazo, Everardo Bracamontes, Jr., Mark E. Hoss and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Conner v. McNeal et al
as 1:2024cv00068
Plaintiff:
Daniel Dewayne Cooner and Daniel Dewayne Conner
Defendant:
Kendrick McNeal, Huey Hoss Mack, Dale Byrnes and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Boone v. Mack
as 1:2024cv00067
Petitioner:
George Boone, Jr.
Respondent:
State Of Alabama and Huey Hoss Mack
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
WIEN v. HOSS CANTEEN, INC. d/b/a BIG LUG CANTEEN
as 1:2023cv02269
Plaintiff:
KAYLA WIEN
Defendant:
HOSS CANTEEN, INC. d/b/a Big Lug Canteen
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
HOSS v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 9:2023cv34280
Plaintiff:
JAMES HOSS
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv03655
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
HOSS v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 9:2023cv00112
Plaintiff:
MILTON HOSS
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Bailey v. Mack
as 1:2023cv00311
Petitioner:
Thomas Justin Bailey
Respondent:
Huey Hoss Mack
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Hoss CLC, LLC et al v. Underwriters at Loyd's, London
as 2:2023cv02644
Plaintiff:
HOSS CLC, LLC and Cody Myers
Defendant:
Syndicate 1886 and Underwriters at Loyd's, London
Interested Party:
Hurricane Ida Program Administrator
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Insurance Contract
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
