Cases 1 - 10 of 11
Smith v. Las Vegas Metropolitan Police Department et al
as 2:2023cv00092
Plaintiff:
Mary Smith
Defendant:
Las Vegas Metropolitan Police Department, Wellpath LLC, Rachel Clark and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Andrews et al v. United Property and Casualty Insurance Co.
as 2:2022cv03317
Plaintiff:
Hugh Andrews and Susan Andrews
Defendant:
United Property and Casualty Insurance Co.
Interested Party:
Hurricane Ida Program Administrator
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Insurance Contract
Niceley v. Tennessee Department of Correction
as 3:2022cv00242
Petitioner:
Hugh Andrew Niceley
Respondent:
Tennessee Department of Correction
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
MILLER v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2021cv25879
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
HUGH ANDREW MILLER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Christopher Olsen v. Michelle Olsen, et al
as 17-35464
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CHRISTOPHER WILLIAM OLSEN
Defendant - Appellee:
MICHELLE OLSEN, CRAIG OLSEN, KEVIN OLSEN and others
Olsen v. Olsen et al
as 3:2017cv05281
Plaintiff:
Christopher William Olsen
Defendant:
Michelle Olsen, Craig Olsen, Kevin Olsen and others
Cause Of Action: No cause code entered
Johnson et al v. C. R. Bard, Inc.
as 2:2012cv07366
Plaintiff:
Alice Johnson and Hugh Andrew Johnson
Defendant:
C. R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Hugh Nicely v. David Mill
as 11-5735
Petitioner - Appellant:
HUGH ANDREW NICELY
Respondent - Appellee:
DAVID MILLS, Warden
Fields v. Golden Rule Insurance Company
as 3:2011cv00002
Plaintiff:
Hugh Andrew Fields
Defendant:
Golden Rule Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Domestic Bank v. Sarlo et al
as 7:2010cv01582
Plaintiff:
Domestic Bank
Defendant:
Joseph Sarlo, H Hugh Andrews, II and Integrated Merchant Systems
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
