Cases 1 - 10 of 19,674
Dale v. Stephens et al
as 2:2024cv02053
Plaintiff:
Jason Dale
Defendant:
Former Sheriff Jimmy Stephens, Sheriff Tom Hughes, Jail Administrator Jacob Schook and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Nance v. Hughes et al
as 1:2024cv03485
Plaintiff:
Ellean Nance
Defendant:
Latonya Hughes, C. Truitt and John Doe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv03273
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Hughes v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 3:2024cv00136
Plaintiff:
Kaitlin Hughes
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv01835
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Dahl v. Hughes et al
as 3:2024cv01182
Plaintiff:
Brandon Dahl
Defendant:
Latoya Hughes and IDOC Directors
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Perry v. Gonzales et al
as 3:2024cv50161
Plaintiff:
Oceanus Perry
Defendant:
Warden Gonzales, Andre Matevousian, Timothy Moisant and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Wintrode v. Captain Hughes et al
as 1:2024cv00223
Plaintiff:
Joshwa Aaron Wintrode
Defendant:
Captain Hughes, Sgt. Ron Owen, Deputy Rebecca Coffman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ballance v. Illinois Department of Correction et al
as 3:2024cv03100
Plaintiff:
Kevas Ballance
Defendant:
Illinois Department of Correction, J.B. Pritzker, Latoya Hughes and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Mahmoud v. Holz et al
as 2:2024cv00806
Plaintiff:
Mohamed Abdalla Mahmoud
Defendant:
Holz, Bartlette, Brendal and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
