Cases 1 - 10 of 497
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 24-1298
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv00375
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00222
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00227
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Ramos-Ramos, et al v. Olavarria-Cruz, et al
as 23-1940
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JOSE A. RAMOS-RAMOS, ORLANDO MENDEZ-LOPEZ, IGNERIS A. PEREZ-ROSARIO and others
Defendant / Appellee:
PHD MAYRA OLAVARRIA-CRUZ, in her official capacity as President of the University of Puerto Rico and SINDICATO DE TRABAJADORES DE LA UNIVERSIDAD DE PUERTO RICO
Interested Party:
AMERICAN FEDERATION OF STATE, COUNTY AND MUNICIPAL EMPLOYEES, AMERICAN FEDERATION OF TEACHERS, SERVICE EMPLOYEES INTERNATIONAL UNION and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 23-7145
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 23-7141
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 9:2023cv05045
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 0:2023cv02875
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal - Employment Discrim
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2023cv40115
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451 Employment Discrimination
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
