Cases 1 - 10 of 1,311
VANDERFORD v. DIXON et al
as 4:2024cv00243
Plaintiff:
PERRY GENE VANDERFORD
Defendant:
RICKY D DIXON, INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICES IRS and INMATE TRUST FUND
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00463
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 621 Job Discrimination (Age)
Hunt v. Internal Revenue Service et al
as 4:2024cv00483
Plaintiff:
Brandon David Hunt
Defendant:
Internal Revenue Service and IRS Commissioner
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Alan v. U.S. of America/IRS
as 6:2024cv06306
Plaintiff:
David P. Alan
Defendant:
U.S. of America/IRS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Alan v. United States of America IRS
as 6:2024cv06290
Plaintiff:
David P. Alan
Defendant:
United States of America IRS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 9:2024cv80585
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Emmett v. IRS et al
as 1:2024cv00489
Plaintiff:
Barry Emmett
Defendant:
IRS, IRS Corporation, IRS Director Austin and others
Cause Of Action: 26 U.S.C. § 7426 IRS: Wrongful Levy for Taxes
Rahmani v. IRS et al
as 1:2024cv00706
Plaintiff:
Najia Rahmani
Defendant:
IRS, Paul Ferguson, Social Security Administration and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question
AZCONA v. CAMDEN COUNTY DRUG COURT, et al
as 1:2024cv05644
Plaintiff:
DANIEL AZCONA
Defendant:
Camden County Drug Court, NEW BRUNSWICK POLICE DEPT., N/DOC Staff Male and Female and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Weickgenant, et al v. US Department of the Treasury, Internal Revenue Service (IRS)
as 2:2024cv00281
Plaintiff:
The Weickgenant Family and Tom Weickgenant
Defendant:
US Department of the Treasury, Internal Revenue Service (IRS)
Cause Of Action: 48 U.S.C. § 1985 Conspiracy/Deprivation Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
