Cases 11 - 16 of 16
Barkley et al v. 4520 Corp., Inc. et al
as 1:2020cv00220
Defendant:
Goulds Pumps, Incorporated, Covil Corporation, GREAT BARRIER INSULATION CO., INC. and others
Plaintiff:
Rita W. Barkley and Randy W. Barkley
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Sharon Whitehead v. Aurora Pump Company
as 20-1676
Defendant / Appellee:
FISHER CONTROLS INTERNATIONAL LLC, Wholly owned subsidiary of Emerson Electric Compnay, AURORA PUMP COMPANY, GOULDS PUMPS, INCORPORATED and others
Defendant:
UNITED CONVEYOR CORPORATION, STERLING FLUID SYSTEMS USA LLC, f/k/a Peerless Pumps Co., MCNALLY INDUSTRIES, INC., successor-in-interest to NORTHERN FIRE APPARATUS and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
SHARON K. WHITEHEAD, Individually and as Executrix of the Estate of JAMES T. WHITEHEAD, Deceased
MCDANIEL, et al v. JOHN CRANE, INC. et al
as 1:2019cv00359
Defendant:
VIKING PUMP, INC., COVIL CORPORATION, GRINNELL LLC and others
Plaintiff:
DEBORAH J. MCDANIEL and KENNETH R. MCDANIEL
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Toy et al v. Honeywell International, Inc. et al
as 4:2019cv00326
Defendant:
Alfa Laval, Inc., Standard Motor Products, Inc., Smothers Parts international and others
Plaintiff:
agnes toy, Thomas h. toy, sr, Thomas H. Toy and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Asbestos Litigation
In re Toy Asbestos Litigation
as 4:2019cv00325
Plaintiff:
AGNES TOY, THOMAS TOY and Thomas H. Toy, Sr.
Defendant:
Copes-Vulcan, Inc., Genuine Parts Company, National Automotive Parts Association and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Petition for Removal
Toy et al v. Honeywell International Inc. et al
as 4:2019cv00336
Defendant:
Viking Pump, Inc., Standard Motor Products, Inc., Air & Liquid Systems Corporation and others
Plaintiff:
AGNES TOY, THOMAS TOY and Thomas H. Toy, Sr.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Asbestos Litigation
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
