Cases 1 - 10 of 35
Castellan v. LeFever
as 1:2023cv00029
Petitioner:
Ivan Lopez Castellan
Respondent:
Acting Warden M. LeFever
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Edwards v. Westchester County
as 22-585
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Clint Edwards
Defendant / Appellee:
Christopher Arocho, Correction Officer
Defendant:
Westchester County, Department of Corrections, Eric Middleton, Assistant Warden and others
LOPEZ v. BEARD
as 2:2022cv00168
Plaintiff:
GEORGE IVAN LOPEZ
Defendant:
JEFFREY A. BEARD
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lopez-Salas v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
as 6:2021cv00477
Plaintiff:
Ivan Lopez-Salas
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Bryan Collier, Lisa Phillips and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lopez et al v. Wetzel et al
as 3:2021cv01819
Plaintiff:
George Ivan Lopez, Darien Houser, Gerald Watkins and others
Defendant:
John E. Wetzel, Jeffrey A. Beard, Martin F. Horn and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
LOPEZ v. CITY OF LEHIGH COUNTY et al
as 5:2021cv04388
Plaintiff:
GEORGE IVAN LOPEZ
Defendant:
CITY OF LEHIGH COUNTY, JAMES B. MARTIN, JOSH SHAPIRO and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lopez-Salas v. Aillon et al
as 6:2020cv00477
Defendant:
MIchael Goldman, Sangmin Kim, Saifur Rashid and others
Plaintiff:
Ivan Lopez-Salas
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
LOPEZ v. COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA BUREAU OF PROFESSIONAL COMPLIANCE OFFICE et al
as 2:2019cv00367
Defendant:
COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA BUREAU OF PROFESSIONAL COMPLIANCE OFFICE, JANE AND JOHN DOE and JOSEPH J. SILVA
Plaintiff:
GEORGE IVAN LOPEZ
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
LOPEZ v. WETZEL et al
as 2:2014cv04851
Defendant:
JOHN WETZEL, ANTHONY MILLER, ROBERT GILMORE and others
Plaintiff:
GEORGE IVAN LOPEZ
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Mendez v. Doe
as 14-4005
Plaintiff - Appellant:
IVAN LOPEZ MENDEZ
Defendant - Appellee:
JANE DOE, Doctor at a clinic in Logan Utah
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
