Cases 1 - 10 of 57
Timothy Young v. Todd Blanche, et al
as 26-5168
Plaintiff:
Timothy Doyle Young
Defendant:
Pamela J. Bondi, William M. Blier, O.I.G., Ian Conners and others
Clervrain v. Sessions, et al
as 26-3070
Plaintiff:
MANETIRONY CLERVRAIN
Defendant:
JEFF SESSIONS, LORETTA LYNCH, ERIC H. HOLDER, JR. and others
Timothy Young v. Pamela Bondi, et al
as 25-5274
Plaintiff:
Timothy Doyle Young
Defendant:
Pamela Bondi, William M. Blier, O.I.G., Ian Conners and others
Wells v. Armstrong et al
as 5:2025cv00066
Plaintiff:
Eugene Calvin Wells
Defendant:
C. Gomez, Ian Conners, Jesse Pugh and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv03192
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 (a)(d) - Job Discrimination (Disability Act)
Fly, et al. v. Diaz, et al.
as 24-5509
Defendant:
Dr. JILL ROTH, IAN CONNERS, National Inmate Appeals Administrator, K. FLEMMING, Psychologist at United States Penitentiary and others
Plaintiff:
BRYSON KNOBELOCH, WILLIAM ANTHONY FLY, Nevaeh Olivia Knobeloch and others
Michael Owlfeather-Gorbey v. Ian Conners
as 24-6364
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL S. GORBEY
Defendant:
IAN CONNERS, FBOP Central Office Inmate Appeal Administrator
Murphy v. United States
as 4:2023cv02061
Plaintiff:
James E. Murphy
Defendant:
Ms. White, N.C. English, Ian Conners and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
MOLLER v. TRANSGENDER EXECUTIVE COUNSEL et al
as 1:2023cv00921
Defendant:
TRANSGENDER EXECUTIVE COUNSEL, TEC, IAN CONNERS and others
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL J. MOLLER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ortiz v. Conners et al
as 1:2023cv00203
Plaintiff:
Nathaniel Ortiz
Defendant:
Ian Conners, Scott Finley, Ellen Mace Leibson and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
