Cases 1 - 10 of 28
Sanderfoot Wind & Excavating, inc. v. Black & McDonald, Inc. et al
as 6:2020cv00071
Defendant:
John G. Zimantas, William Ian McDonald, Black & McDonald, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Sanderfoot Wind & Excavating, inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Kevin Theriot v. Daniel LeSatz, et al
as 19-1286
Defendant / Appellee:
JOELL PREBILLE, GRIEVANCE COORDINATOR LOUIE BELENGER, HEARING INVESTIGATOR KEVIN ALFORD and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
KEVIN DWAYNE THERIOT
Theriot #423068 v. Lesatz et al
as 2:2018cv00189
Defendant:
Ian McDonald, David Theut, Daniel Lesatz and others
Plaintiff:
Kevin Dwayne Theriot #423068
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
US v. Ian McDonald
as 18-6412
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
IAN MCDONALD
McDonald v. BMW of North America, LLC et al
as 3:2017cv02011
Plaintiff:
Ian McDonald
Defendant:
BMW of North America, LLC and Does 1 Through 10
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Cruz v. Reel Group LTD et al
as 4:2017cv01729
Plaintiff:
Rene Cruz
Defendant:
Reel Group LTD, Global Energy Group LTD, Ian McDonald and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Michael Lujan v. Bill Ford, et al
as 16-35638
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MICHAEL A. LUJAN
Defendant - Appellee:
BILL FORD, Individual Capacity &Official Capacity, CITY OF MEDFORD, Official Capacity, JACKSON COUNTY, Official Capacity and others
Theriot et al v. Bates et al
as 5:2013cv12180
Plaintiff:
Brian Theriot, Evania Campbell and Rainah Caldwell
Defendant:
Walter Bates, Brian Sullivan, Miachel Rubin and others
Campbell v. Bates et al
as 2:2013cv12182
Plaintiff:
Jeffrey Campbell
Defendant:
Walter Bates, Brian Sullivan, Miachel Rubin and others
Brewer v. City of Medford et al
as 1:2013cv00541
Plaintiff:
Joshua Ryan Brewer
Defendant:
City of Medford, Dep. Chief Tim Doney, Chief Tim George and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
