Cases 1 - 10 of 20
Invisible Fence, Inc. v. Protect Animals With Satellites, LLC et al (JRG2)
as 3:2023cv00403
Plaintiff:
Invisible Fence, Inc.
Defendant:
Protect Animals With Satellites, LLC, Ken Ehrman and Cesar Millan
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 44 Trademark Infringement
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 0:2021cv00722
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 0:2021cv00720
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Invisible Fence, Inc. v. Rocky Top Dog Fence (TV1)
as 3:2017cv00084
Plaintiff:
Invisible Fence, Inc.
Defendant:
Rocky Top Dog Fence
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125
Invisible Fence, Inc. v. Perimeter Technologies, Inc. (JRG1)
as 3:2017cv00082
Plaintiff:
Invisible Fence, Inc.
Defendant:
Perimeter Technologies, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125
Invisible Fence, Inc. v. Petstop of North Georgia LLC
as 1:2017cv00793
Plaintiff:
Invisible Fence, Inc.
Defendant:
Petstop of North Georgia LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1338
Invisible Fence, Inc. v. Sarasota Collective, LLC (PLR2)
as 3:2016cv00625
Plaintiff:
Invisible Fence, Inc.
Defendant:
Sarasota Collective, LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1114
Bridgette Neal v. Duke Energy
as 12-2237
Plaintiff - Appellant:
BRIDGETTE NEAL, a/k/a Bridgette T. Neal
Defendant - Appellee:
DUKE ENERGY, PIKE ELECTRIC, INCORPORATED, SOUTH CAROLINA PUBLIC WORKS and others
Neal v. ORS et al
as 6:2012cv01995
Plaintiff:
Bridgette Neal
Defendant:
Duke Energy, Pike Electric, SC Public Works and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Fido's Fences, Inc. v. Radio Systems Corporation et al
as 2:2012cv00179
Plaintiff:
Fido's Fences, Inc.
Defendant:
Invisible Fence, Inc. and Radio Systems Corporation
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1 Antitrust Litigation
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
