Cases 1 - 10 of 100
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2026cv04216
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 fd Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2026cv01496
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Daniel Feldman v. Sreit Ivy Louisville, LLC, et al
as 26-5633
Plaintiff:
DANIEL FELDMAN
Defendant:
SREIT IVY LOUISVILLE, LLC, dba The Ivy Apartment Homes, HIGHMARK RESIDENTIAL, LLC, ASHLEY LEMONS and others
Ivy v. Social Security Administration
as 2:2026cv04168
Plaintiff:
John Ivy
Defendant:
Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
SWBC Mortgage Corporation v. Ivy et al
as 1:2026cv01150
Plaintiff:
SWBC Mortgage Corporation
Defendant:
Jennifer Ivy and THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2410 Quiet Title
Bishop v. Block, Inc. et al
as 1:2026cv05727
Plaintiff:
Ivy Bishop
Defendant:
Block, Inc. and Amazon.com, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 bc Fed. Question: Breach of Contract
Ivy v. Bisignano
as 2:2026cv00279
Plaintiff:
Kassandra Ivy
Defendant:
Frank Bisignano
Interested Party:
SSA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWW)
Bishop v. Keating
as 1:2026cv05576
Petitioner:
Ivy Bishop
Respondent:
Hon. Maura Keating
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
CRIBAS CRUZ v. FLORIDA SIGN GROUP WEST, LLC et al
as 8:2026cv01893
Plaintiff:
IVIS GEOVANY CRIBAS CRUZ
Defendant:
FLORIDA SIGN GROUP WEST, LLC, FLORIDA SIGN GROUP, LLC,, VISCOM ARCHITECTURAL GRAPHICS, INC. doing business as VISCOM WHOLESALE SIGNAGE and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 0002 (a) Fair Labor Standards Act
Bishop v. Vialet
as 1:2026cv05577
Petitioner:
Ivy Bishop
Respondent:
Denali Vialet
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
