Cases 1 - 10 of 100
Talley v. Emig et al
as 1:2026cv01176
Plaintiff:
Derek J Talley
Defendant:
Warden Brian Emig, Lt. Casey Phelps, Chris Senato and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lucas v. Castillo et al
as 1:2026cv00381
Plaintiff:
Bartley Ray Lucas, Jr.
Defendant:
Officer Evan Castillo, Sergeant Larry Toland and City of Mobile, Alabama
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 0:2026cv62615
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Hahn v. Fast Forward, LLC et al
as 1:2026cv08158
Plaintiff:
Jeffrey Hahn
Defendant:
Fast Forward, LLC, Evan Hedaya, Bert Hedaya and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 203 FLSA: Definitions
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 0:2026cv62616
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
PATTERSON v. MYERS et al
as 2:2026cv02073
Plaintiff:
TEVIN PATTERSON
Defendant:
C/O MYERS, C/O CONNORS, EVAN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Pet Professionals, Inc. d/b/a Petland Topeka et al v. QFS Capital, LLC et al
as 1:2026cv08146
Plaintiff:
Pet Professionals, Inc. d/b/a Petland Topeka and Staci Williams
Defendant:
QFS Capital, LLC and Evan Samlin
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2026cv05244
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Sex)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2026cv00164
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Doe, et al v. Evans, et al
as 26-2060
Plaintiff:
JOHN DOE, JANE DOE and JAMES DOE
Defendant:
PAUL EVANS, individually, ROBERT DUNFORD, individually, MELBERT AHEARN, individually and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
