Cases 1 - 10 of 159
Newkirk v. Artrip et al
as 7:2024cv00164
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Newkirk
Defendant:
Warden Artrip, Investigator Harris, Assistant Warden Blevins and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Kenneth Newkirk v. K. Fleming
as 24-6063
Plaintiff:
KENNETH H. NEWKIRK
Defendant:
LIEUTENANT K. M. FLEMING, HAROLD C. CLARKE, Director, Dept. of Corrections, CHADWICK DOTSON, Director, Dept. of Corrections and others
Robertson et al v. PV Holding Corporation et al
as 4:2023cv01502
Plaintiff:
Lindsay A. Robertson and J.M.R.
Defendant:
PV Holding Corporation and Charles J. Gibson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Tort/Motor Vehicle (
Derrick GibsonIn re: Derrick Gibson
as 23-1981
Petitioner:
In re: DERRICK J. GIBSON
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Richard Gibson v. Jenny Hildebrand
as 23-3798
Petitioner / Appellant:
RICHARD J. GIBSON
Respondent / Appellee:
JENNY HILDEBRAND
Newkirk v. Fleming et al
as 7:2023cv00623
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Newkirk
Defendant:
Lt. KM Fleming, Harold Clarke, Chadwick Dotson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Arroyo v. McGinley et al
as 1:2023cv01083
Plaintiff:
Bryant Arroyo
Defendant:
Thomas S. McGinley, Deputy J. Gibson, Robert Marsh and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Gibson v. United States of America
as 1:2023cv00534
Petitioner:
Derrick J. Gibson
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
David Meyers v. Walter Swiney
as 23-6402
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DAVID MEYERS
Defendant / Appellee:
WALTER SWINEY, Unit Manager, D. C. STALLARD and M. L. COUNTS
Defendant:
U. S. POSTAL SERVICE, J. GIBSON, P. SYLKES and others
Brockman #401131 v. Taskila et al
as 2:2023cv00055
Plaintiff:
Omar Brockman #401131
Defendant:
Kris Taskila, R. Horrocks, T. Bastian and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
